M1:2708 — کین گواهی که ز گفت و رنگ بد / نزد آن قاضی القضاة آن جرح شد

此节诗句出自一个故事，故事中一位丈夫认识到，要想获得神的恩典（“给养”），必须呈现出自己真实的贫困与无助（مفلسی）。他意识到，人不能仅仅通过口头宣称或外在的虔诚表现来“证明”自己的状态。

这节诗句是这个内在反思的高潮。它将上帝比作“万判之判”（قاضی القضات），即最高的法官。在这个神圣的法庭上，世俗法庭所接纳的证据——“言语和外表”（گفت و رنگ）——是不可靠的。它们很容易伪装，因此被“驳回”（جرح شد），这是一个法律术语，意为证据或证人因不可信而失效。

鲁米在此强调的是内在真实性（صدق）与外在表现之间的区别。向上帝祈求时，任何试图通过华丽言辞或虔诚姿态来操纵结果的努力，都只会暴露其虚伪。真正的“证据”是一个人无言的、内在的状态（حال），是一种发自内心的、彻底的谦卑与臣服。只有这种真实的“无助”（بی‌آلتی），才能引来那位“富有的君王”（شاه غنی）的慈悲。

This couplet concludes a short dialogue about how to approach God for help. A man, feeling destitute, believes he needs to present a compelling “witness” to his poverty to earn God’s mercy. His wife warns him against using ordinary proof — eloquent pleas and a sorrowful appearance (goft o rang).

This verse explains why such proof fails. God is the Qāḍī al-Quḍāt (Judge of all Judges), an ultimate arbiter who sees beyond superficial evidence. The term jarḥ is a technical one from Islamic law, meaning the act of discrediting a witness. Rumi uses it here to say that God immediately dismisses any testimony that is merely a performance. The only valid proof of one’s inner state is sincerity (ṣidq), which, as the next couplet states, shines on its own without needing words.